Using data wisely

Par naomi.akamatsu… ,

Purpose & Strategic Importance

Strategic planning should build first on the data that already exists. Before collecting new information, National Societies should review the resources and evidence they already hold. This makes the process more efficient, credible, and focused. Looking at data over a period of time also allows long-term trends to be identified and understood.

Why this matters

  • Ensures that new data collection is targeted rather than duplicating what already exists.
  • Strengthens credibility by grounding the process in evidence.
  • Saves resources and time that can instead be invested in consultation and analysis.

Enabling Resources

The role of the Coordination Team

It is usually the responsibility of the coordination team to pull together what data already exist — both from inside the National Society and from external sources. Their role is to:

  • Compile and review existing information.
  • Identify gaps where further consultation or research is needed.
  • Ensure that data are presented in a clear way that can be shared back with leadership, branches, and stakeholders.

Inputs

Common types of data a National Society may already hold
  • Service and project figures – showing the number of people reached.
  • Feedback and complaints data – satisfaction, feedback, and complaints collected from people served.
  • Financial records – accounts from both branch and national levels.
  • Volunteer and member data – numbers of volunteers, members, supporters, and hours volunteered.
  • Volunteer surveys – data on happiness, motivation, and retention.
  • Organisational and operational assessments – results from self-assessment tools, service or project evaluations, and follow-up actions.
  • Monitoring of previous strategies – including mid-term or final evaluations of past plans.
  • Governing Board and General Assembly minutes – highlighting strategic issues and challenges.
  • Records of engagement with public authorities and partners – notes from meetings that show priorities and expectations.

Even if some sources are a few years old, they are often still useful and can provide relevant insights to inform today’s strategic planning.

Inputs

Additional background data sources

Strategic planning can also benefit from information gathered outside the Society:

  • Reports from public authorities and international organisations (e.g. World Bank, WHO, UN agencies) on health, disasters, and demographics.
  • Studies on trends in areas such as volunteerism or private sector giving.
  • Insights from past events such as partnership workshops or strategic brainstorming.
  • Government or sector-specific data (e.g. from Ministries or humanitarian forums).

These sources help place the National Society’s work in a broader national and global context.

Activities & Decisions

How much data is enough?

A key challenge for coordination teams is knowing how much data to collect.

  • Too little risks decisions being made in the dark.
  • Too much is costly, time-consuming, and may overwhelm the process.

Strategic planning is about the big picture, so the guiding question should be:

  • Do the data give a “good enough” picture of the National Society to base long-term decisions on?

For every proposed data collection exercise, ask:

  • What do we want to learn?
  • What is the cost of collecting it (time, money)?
  • What are the risks of not collecting it (missing insights, or leaving stakeholders feeling excluded)?

Examples & Learning

“As part of our strategic planning process, we reviewed key industry documents on health and humanitarian work. This helped us better align with the national authorities and improve our collaboration.” — Director of Programs, Central African Red Cross

This shows how existing information — both internal and external — can provide a strong starting point and strengthen the credibility of the strategy.

No People enabling resources available.

No Governance enabling resources available.

No Data enabling resources available.

Submitted on

The purpose of the IFRC Framework for Evaluation is to guide how evaluations are designed, planned, managed, conducted, and utilized by the Secretariat of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and its network.

image
IFRC Framework for Evaluations 2024
Submitted on

This tool is a series of questions for National Society senior management / governance to help design a strategic plan review process.​

The idea is that every strategic plan should be reviewed periodically to ensure that it is relevant, and identify ways in which experience of implementation and changes in the external environment may require adaptations in the strategic plan.​

Review can be an internal process within the National Society, or involve external actors: consultants or peers, as best suits the National Society.​

These are proposed questions to be adapted by the National Society to fit circumstances, resources and timeframes, and included in a terms of reference or similar document, signed off by National Society senior leadership.​

image
C3_T05_Serise of questions to structure midterm review of a strategic plan
Submitted on

This tool is a series of questions for the coordination team to help them identify what data it is helpful for the National Society to collect as part of the strategic planning process.​

image
C3_T04_Data needs mapping

No Facilities and Equipment enabling resources available.

No Guidance enabling resources available.

Join the Community of Practice

You need to be logged in to access community conversations.
Please log in ou register to join the discussion and connect with other members.